Skip to content

Conversation

@guessi
Copy link

@guessi guessi commented Dec 10, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

bump the image version for the node-local-dns-cache

  • registry.k8s.io/dns/k8s-dns-kube-dns:{1.26.4 -> 1.26.7}
  • registry.k8s.io/dns/k8s-dns-dnsmasq-nanny:{1.26.4 -> 1.26.7}
  • registry.k8s.io/dns/k8s-dns-sidecar:{1.26.4 -> 1.26.7}

Which issue(s) this PR is related to:

Special notes for your reviewer:

n/a

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

bump kube-dns and nodelocaldns to v1.26.7

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

n/a

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Dec 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Please note that we're already in Test Freeze for the release-1.35 branch. This means every merged PR will be automatically fast-forwarded via the periodic ci-fast-forward job to the release branch of the upcoming v1.35.0 release.

Fast forwards are scheduled to happen every 6 hours, whereas the most recent run was: Wed Dec 10 09:39:21 UTC 2025.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Dec 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @guessi!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kubernetes 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kubernetes has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @guessi. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: guessi
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mrhohn for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from MrHohn and bowei December 10, 2025 10:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants